Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hauck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1984No. 321Published

1Per curiam

The Commonwealth appeals from the order of March 3, 1982 granting appellee’s motion to dismiss indictment.

The record, pursuant to a stipulation of facts, indicates that appellee, while employed as a barmaid in an establishment which provided an electronic draw poker machine, “paid off” a liquor control agent and local police officer who had won free games on said machine. Appellee was also *463observed “paying off” other players of the machine. The machine was of the same type as discussed in Commonwealth v. One Electro-Sport Draw Poker Machine, 297 Pa.Super. 54, 443 A.2d 295 (1981), rev’d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. One Electro-Sport Draw Poker MacHine, Serial No. 258Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API