Legal Opinion

Londy v. Driscoll

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Tort, for malicious prosecution and arrest. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Blodgett, J., who found for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

The evidence tended to show that the plaintiff was a resident of Boston, with a place of business there upon a well known street, with his name, place of business, and boarding place in the city directory, and that he was assessed for taxes in the-city, and that he was actually in Boston about seven months in the year. Also that he was a member of a firm which had a place of business in Chicago, and that previous to the arrest he had travelled all over the country and was away much of the time, and that at the time of his arrest he had an engagement in Providence, Rhode Island, and that very…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Connery v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Donnelly v. DaggettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. GillespieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Keefe v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Boylen v. TracyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API