Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Wead
New York Supreme Court
Action by indorsee of promissory note against the payees thereof. Defense: Statute of Limitations.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action is by the indorsee against the payees of a note for the recovery of a balance of $951.26, with interest due ihereon. The cause of action accrued February, 1890. At that time both defendants were residents of Malone, ÜST. Y. In April, 1890, the defendant Leslie C. Wead departed from this State, and took up his residence and has ever since resided in Massachusetts. The codefendant, Charles K. Wead, left Malone January, 1892, to accept a position in the Patent Office at Washington, D. C., but did not give up his legal residence at Malone, and voted there at the last general election.
Th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Murdock v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Henry v. . RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Burroughs v. BloomerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Bennett v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.