Legal Opinion

Young (Gregory) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2013No. 61060Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

This evidence provides slight to marginal evidence, Sheriff v. Shade, 109 Nev. 826, 828,

858 P.2d 840, 841

(1993), that Young had constructive possession of the vehicle, see Palmer v. State, 112 Nev. 763, 768-69,

920 P.2d 112, 115

(1996) (discussing constructive possession); cf. Baker v. State, 93 Nev. 11,

558 P.2d 629

(1977) (defendant's presence in a vehicle containing stolen property combined with surrounding circumstances gave rise to reasonable inference that he probably possessed the stolen property), and thus committed the charged offense, see NRS 205.273(1)(b). Accordingly, we conclude that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. EmeryNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Palmer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sheriff v. ShadeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Baker v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API