Legal Opinion

People v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Phillip Friedman, from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the Second Division of the City of New York, rendered against him on the 20th- day of May, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Cabe, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions convicting the defendant of a violation of section. 42 of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York. This section reads as follows : “ No meat, fish, eggs, birds, fowl, fruit, vegetables or milk not being then healthy, fresh, sound, wholesome and safe for .human food, nor any meat or fish that died by disease or accident, shall be brought into The City of New York, or offered or held for sale as such food anywhere' in said city,, nor shall any such articles be kept or stored therein. For the purposes of this section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. People v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API