United States v. Local 36 of International Fishermen & Allied Workers
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment and their challenge and motion to strike out the entire trial jury panel are both based upon the same grounds. In view of the fact that the February 1946 grand jury which returned the indictment and the current trial jury panel were chosen from the names selected in the same method and manner by the jury commissioner and the clerk, the stipulation that the two motions might be heard together was approved.
Briefly stated, the contention is that the grand jury for the February 1946 term and the present trial jury panel were…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
- United States v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Alvin Chance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.