Legal Opinion

State v. Sollars

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1986No. WD 36467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Presiding Judge.

Defendant John Sollars appeals his conviction on two counts of possessing a motor vehicle on which the manufacturer’s identification number has been removed or altered. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the accuracy of the jury instructions on both counts. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence after a guilty verdict, an appellate court must accept as true all the evidence and reasonable inferences that may be drawn from it which support the verdict. State v. Morgan, 592 S.W.2d 796, 805 (Mo.1980) (en banc).…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. PolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmootMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. SollarsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API