Legal Opinion

People v. Public Service Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDominio S. Binaldi, J.

These are separate motions made by a surety to vacate and set aside judgments resulting from four bail forfeitures. The facts surrounding each forfeiture are substantially the same, and as a result, the same question of law is involved. In each instance, upon appearance of a defendant for sentence, a fine or a jail term in lieu of payment thereof was imposed, and extensions granted to each defendant to make payment of the fine. The bonds were forfeited upon failure to appear and make payment of the fines on the adjourned date. The fines have since been paid by three of the defendants and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. JUSTICE COURT OF VISTA TOWNSHIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. People ex rel. Schindler v. KaiserNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Commonwealth v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Stuyvesant InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. United States v. CatinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. People v. BrannonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API