Legal Opinion

Hull v. Gamblin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1968No. 4235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge:

Appellee, a Texas resident, filed suit in a Texas court alleging fraud and seeking damages from appellant, a District of Columbia resident. Substituted service, pursuant to Article 2031b of Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes of the State of Texas, was had upon appellant, who did not appear in Texas to defend the action. The court appointed an attorney ad litem to represent her, and, after trial, judgment was entered for appellee. Thereafter, ap-pellee filed an action in the District of Columbia Court of General Sessions alleging that the Texas judgment remained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Siskind v. Villa Foundation for Education, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Harold Lawrence BlasiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Hoppenfeld v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bernstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API