Legal Opinion

Armas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 2018No. Case No. 5D17-1528PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLambert, J.

The issue that we resolve in this case is whether Appellant was placed in double jeopardy, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution, when he was tried and convicted upon an information charging him with one count of possession of cannabis in an amount exceeding 20 grams with the intent to sell or deliver and a second count of manufacturing cannabis, each being a third-degree felony in violation of section 893.13(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2015). For the following reasons, we conclude that no double jeopardy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. State v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API