Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between W. M. Girvan, Inc., and Nicholas M. Robilotto, as President of Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memobandum.
The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum:
The burden of appellant employer’s contention is that the arbitrator here should have upheld the dismissal of two employees on the ground that their conduct constituted “ dishonesty involving theft ”. We conclude that the employer’s application to vacate the arbitration award (which, while it set aside the dismissals, did impose periods of suspension without pay) has been properly denied.
The arbitration clause here is very broad. It embraces “ [grievances [not otherwise defined or limited]…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between W. M. Girvan, Inc., & International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 294Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Murray Walter, Inc. & Laborers International Union of North America, Local No. 7Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Binghamton Civil Service Forum & City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between W. M. Girvan, Inc., and Nicholas M. Robilotto, as President of Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974