Legal Opinion

Heartfelt v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1994No. 20541PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Treveillian Heartfelt appeals from the summary dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief. We are asked to decide whether Heartfelt’s application alleged facts sufficient to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on the voluntariness of his guilty pleas and on the propriety of the procedure at sentencing. For the reasons given below, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background.

Heartfelt was charged in two separate Blaine County cases with two counts of forgery and three counts of first degree burglary. Pursuant to an amended plea-bargain agreement, Heartfelt…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. AyalaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Roeder v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API