Legal Opinion
Harco v. Ithaca Gun Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 10, 1969No. NC 50-69PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing the defendants for damages allegedly caused by violation of the antitrust laws.
The defendant, Ithaca Gun Company, has moved to dismiss the action or in lieu thereof to quash the return of service of summons on the grounds: that said defendant is incorporated un*587der the laws of the State of New York and is neither an inhabitant cf. nor is found in the District of Utah; that defendant is not subject to service of process in the District of Utah; that the defendant has not been properly served with process in this action.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Shibo Hayashi v. Red Wing Peat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Hayashi v. Sunshine Garden Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1967
- Southern Photo Material Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- White v. Shiller Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1974
- J. & B. & S. RESTAURANT CORP., INC. v. Henry's Drive-In, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1973
- Seattle-First National Bank v. O/S MADRONADistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1975