Legal Opinion

Rozell v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered July 13, 1998 in Washington County, which, inter alia, limited the documents that defendant was required to produce in response to plaintiffs omnibus discovery demands.

While changing a bit and inspecting a pneumatic hammer manufactured by defendant, plaintiff was allegedly injured when the hammer accidentally discharged and propelled a steel cylinder into his face. Paragraph 13 of plaintiff’s omnibus discovery demands seeks “[a] copy of any report or study made or received by the Defendant at any time relating to” the accidental…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winiecki v. Melroe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Cramer v. KuhnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. DeDivitis v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Horn v. Thompson & Johnson Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Ranne v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API