Legal Opinion

Sutton v. University of Southern Colorado

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1994No. 92CA1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Both the respondent, University of Southern Colorado, and the complainants, Charles Sutton and Jack Lowe, appeal from the order of the State Personnel Board that was entered after our former remand of the cause to it. See Tising v. State Personnel Board, 825 P.2d 1011 (Colo.App.1991). We again reverse and remand for further consideration.

The operative facts giving rise to the complainants’ grievances are substantially undisputed. Those grievances arose from the University’s reorganization of its campus police force in 1985. Prior to that reorganization, the police…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Allstate Insurance v. KelleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Polynesian Cultural Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Department of Human Services v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Miller v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. Department of Human Services v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API