Legal Opinion
Ball v. Allstate Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1993PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Insurance Law § 3407 provides that the failure to furnish proofs of loss as specified in a contract of insurance shall not result in a forfeiture or diminution of a claim unless the insurer gives the insured written notice that it requires proofs of loss. It further provides:
"If the insured shall furnish proofs of loss within sixty days after the receipt of such notice and such form or forms, or within any longer period of time specified in such notice, such insured shall be deemed to have complied with the provisions of such contract of insurance relating to the time…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Igbara Realty Corp. v. New York Property InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wiley v. . Solvay Process Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Peabody v. . SatterleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. GallupMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
4Cited by17 opinions
- King v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rust v. ReyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ingarra v. General Accident/PG InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Darvick v. General Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Klyn v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.