Legal Opinion

Trovillion v. Chemical Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1996No. 68196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

This is an appeal from a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of L. Carr and Ellen Trovillion (respondents). The trial court found respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law under §§ 443.060 RSMo 1986 and 443.130 RSMo Supp.1993 because their mortgagee, appellant, Chemical Mortgage Company (Chemical) failed to deliver a deed of release within thirty days of receiving satisfaction of respondents’ mortgage. We reverse and remand with instructions.

The facts are undisputed. In 1993, Chemical held a mortgage on respondents’ property. In October of 1993,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Snow v. BassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Trovillion v. Countrywide Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Murray v. Fleet Mortgage Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Berndsen v. Flagstar Bank, FSBMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API