Legal Opinion

Lidonnici v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 6, 1926No. 4405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The appellants were plaintiffs below. The suit was brought to restrain the Secretary of Labor and the Commissioner of Immigration of the United States from deporting the plaintiffs from this country upon an alleged finding that plaintiffs were aliens who had entered the country without right and in violation of the immigration statutes. The lower court upon mo? tion dismissed plaintiffs’ amended bill for want of -merit, and this appeal was taken from that decree.

In the amended bill the plaintiffs allege that complainant Lidonniei is a resident of, and is domiciled in,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Lapina v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Angelus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Hee Fuk Yuen v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  5. United States ex rel. Randazzo v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jose Tiania Tejeda v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. KANEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  3. Jose Tiania Tejeda v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States ex rel. Cizura v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API