Estate of Zaritz v. Manitou & Pikes Peak Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, hereinafter referred to as Zaritz, seek review of a final order of the District Court granting defendant-ap-pellee’s, hereinafter referred to as Pikes Peak Railway, motion for summary judgment.
The parties agree that there are no genuine issues as to any material fact. Thus, the issues presented were directed to the court’s determination of matters of law. For purposes of appellate review we are guided by the principle that summary judgment cannot be granted unless the “pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of ZaritzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979