Legal Opinion

Allard v. Frizzell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1976No. 76-1251PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant corporations, National Audubon Society, Inc. and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., sought to intervene in a three-judge case pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Allard v. Frizzell, Civil No. 75-W-1000. Their motions were denied, and they have taken this appeal.

The trial court, considering the motions under Rule 24(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., determined:

“The application is timely; it is doubtful that there is any interest claimed in feathers which are part of Indian artifacts manufactured long before the statutes were passed and it is even more doubtful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. Sally Saunders Toles, Elyse Saunders Patterson and Sue Saunders Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Western Energy Alliance v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bill P. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. San Juan County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API