Legal Opinion

Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 27, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

2Per curiam

The premises in question constitute “ commercial space ” within the meaning of the Commercial Rent Law, chapter 3 of the Laws of 1945, as amended by chapter 272 of the Laws of 1946. Plaintiff, therefore, had the burden of proving that the rent charged was not greater than the emergency rent for such commercial space. (Flo-Ru-Na Inc. v. Zimmerman, 185 Misc. 759.) Plaintiff failed to sustain that burden. .

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendants to abide the. event.

MacCrate, Smith and Steiebrink, JJ., concur.

Judgment…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flo-Ru-Na Inc. v. ZimmermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Empire Plexiglass Corp. v. Enterprise Industries, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1947
  2. Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API