Hicks v. City of Ashland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Richardson
Reversing.
Ashland, Ky., is a city of the second class. Its general council by ordinance provided and entered into a contract with Hunt-Forbes Construction Company for the construction of a portion of Thirteenth street abutting the property of Taylor Hicks and Sarah Hicks. After the street was constructed, the general council by an ordinance apportioned the cost at $7.43 plus per foot, or $944.70 for one of their lots and $598.06 for another. The validity of the ordinance, the manner of making of the contract for the improvement, and the proceedings of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Hazard v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- City of Catlettsburg v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Mulligan v. McGregorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- City of Covington v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- McHenry v. SelvageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunt-Forbes Construction Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Jones v. Carey Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949