Hess v. Denman Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above).' The lumber company undertakes to hold'the owner of the building personally liable for the unpaid balance of the account for material furnished to the contractor. The suit is based upon the alleged neglect to take a bond of the contractor as required by Acts 1915, p. 223. As applicable here, article 5623 of the act reads:
Any “owner * * * shall cause to be executed a written contract for such erection, repair or improvement and cause the same to be filed with the county clerk of the county where the property is situated, and shall also cause to be executed…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Williams v. BaldwinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Davis v. EstesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Wylie v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Big Three Welding Equipment Co. v. Crutcher, Rolfs, Cummings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.