Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The record indicates the testimony in question was willfully and purposely false and substantially affected the results.
It would manifestly be unjust to permit the judgment to' stand under these circumstances.
We are in accord with the determination made by the Appellate Division and subscribe to the reasons expressed in its opinion.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.
For reversal—None.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Willis v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Hodgson v. ApplegateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Pizzi v. BakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Gilgallon v. BondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Hintenberger v. GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.