Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1983No. 82-125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

We granted the petition for writ of cer-tiorari in this case to consider the following issue:

Did the circuit court err in granting the motion in limine which prevented plaintiff from introducing evidence of loss of wages as one element of damages in his malicious prosecution action?

The Court of Civil Appeals found error regarding this issue. After careful consideration, we affirm that court’s decision.

The facts of the case are set out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. We see no need to repeat them, but proceed directly to a discussion of the issue. The petitioners,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Martin v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. McKinney v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meeks v. OPP Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Epperson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. East Drive Venture v. mc.donnellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API