Legal Opinion
Inland Engineering & Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 1930No. 4756PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Inland Engineering & Construction Company against the defendants Maryland Casualty Company, surety, and Farr, Lashus & Farr, a copartnership — sometimes referred to herein as Farr — entered upon a verdict after trial by a jury.
About January, 1925, the Inland Engineering & Construction Company entered into a contract with the state road commission of Utah for the construction of Federal aid projects Nos. 98A, 98B, and 82A. We are concerned only with projects Nos. 98A and 98B. The contract itself is brief. By…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Utah State Building & Loan Ass'n v. PerkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Robinson v. Dibble's AdministratorSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
- Morrisette v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Starkweather v. KittleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Waterman v. MattairSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill & Combs v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Securities Credit Corp. v. WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 1953