Legal Opinion

Mulford v. Mangano

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 19, 1994PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review following the Appeals Court’s issuance of its opinion in Mulford v. Mangano, 35 Mass. App. Ct. 800 (1994). The defendant Mangano argues that, as a coemployee of the plaintiff, he is immune from liability in this case.

The plaintiff argues that the Appeals Court erred in applying the traditional workers’ compensation “course of employment” standard in determining whether Mangano as a coemployee was immune from tort liability under the workers’ compensation act. G. L. c. 152 (1992 ed.). We shall also consider whether the Appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Business Incentives, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. O'CONNELL v. ChasdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Souza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Saharceski v. MarcureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lev v. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Brown v. Nutter, McClennen & FishMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Grant v. John Hancock Mutual, Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. Fredette v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Horney v. Westfield Gage Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API