Legal Opinion

Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2004No. 117 EM 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

842 A.2d 919 (2004)

Frank and Margaret IEROPOLI, Appellants

v.

AC&S CORPORATION, National Gypsum Company, Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Bell Asbestos Mines, Inc., Combustion Engineering Inc., Crown Cork Seal Company, Inc., Flexitallic Gasket Company, Gaf Corporation, Garfield Molding Company, Inc., Garlock, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Meriden Molded Plastics, Metropolitan Life Insurance, Nosroc Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Peltz Rowley Chemicals Company, Pfizer, Inc., Rapid American Corporation, Bevco Industries, Turner & Newall, Ltd., Union Carbide…

Also in this document: Dissent · Newman; Dissent · Saylor.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API