Legal Opinion
In re R./G. Children
New York City Family Court
Decided September 8, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Philip C. Segal, J.
Petitioner’s motion in this child protective proceeding for an order directing respondent Angel O. to submit to a forensic mental health examination by petitioner’s expert is granted in accordance with the following.
The court expresses no opinion as to whether the results of such an examination would be admissible at the fact-finding hearing. (Compare, Matter of Tyson G., 144 AD2d 673 [2d Dept 1988], with Matter of Aryeh-Levi K., 134 AD2d 428 [2d Dept 1987], and People v Wesley, 83 NY2d 417 [1994]; see also, McCord, Syndromes, Profiles and Other Mental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Burgel v. BurgelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re Tyson G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re Tricia K.New York City Family Court · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Tyler S.New York City Family Court · 2002