Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Milwaukee Concrete Studios, Limited v. Fjeld Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, and Janice Krueger

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 1993No. 92-2603Published

1ConcurrenceShadur, Senior District Judge

Determining where an individual “may be found” ordinarily poses no difficulties: That locution is normally understood in its literal sense of the individual’s physical presence. Indeed, for a long time the one-to-one correlation between the concept of being “found” in a place and being physically present there marked the outer limit of a court’s — and hence of an opposing litigant’s — ability to *452exercise power over an individual defendant (Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565 (1877)). In those days it would have been unheard of to question the concept that tagging an individual with a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Editorial Musical Latino Americana, S.A. v. Mar International Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. ISC-Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Altech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API