Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Sullivan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 2005No. 2004-CA-1715PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
11 TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
This case arises from a medical malpractice action in which the trial court granted appellees Motion for Involuntary Dismissal finding appellant had not met the requisite burden of proof. It is from this judgment appellant appeals.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 16, 1988, Mr. Edward James Tucker (hereinafter “Mr. Tucker”) underwent a vasectomy performed by Dr. Jerry W. Sullivan, M.D. (hereinafter “Dr. Sullivan”) who was an employee of the State of Louisiana at the time of the procedure. During the vasectomy operation, Dr. Sullivan removed 9.8 and 9.3…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Kem Search, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pennington v. Ochsner Clinic Found.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018