Legal Opinion

Baumgart v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1987No. Appeal, No. 648 C. D. 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Norbert J. Baumgart (Petitioner) appeals from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referees decision granting Pullman Standards (Employer) petition for modification. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

On August 17, 1978, Petitioner sustained a work-related injury to his back. Pursuant to a notice of com*73pensation payable, Employer paid benefits to Petitioner at a rate of $213 per week. On July 29, 1982, Employer filed a petition for modification alleging that Petitioners injuries had resolved into only a partial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chavis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Sakell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API