Legal Opinion
Rush Ex Rel. Rush v. Mullins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1962No. 39383PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The evidence of the plaintiff as to how the accident happened is as follows:
“Q. Would you tell these gentlemen how come you to fall ?
“A. Well, as this other boy told you, we were skating around, and this other trio came up in a train style, and they went around his side and cut in front of him, and so it shook him a little bit, and the girl in the middle, she got shook, shook up a little bit, and the other boy fell. We kept on going sort of slow, slowed down a bit so he could catch up, and when he caught up, about the time he got the girl’s hand again, I guess, they came by my side, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hembree v. Southard Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. WittySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sloan v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Johnson v. Mid-South Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Guffey v. Towery ex rel. TowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.