Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dawidoff ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Over-the-Road Employees, Local Union No. 544

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-2053Published

1DissentBowman, Circuit Judge

Based upon the totality of circumstances, the Regional Director concluded there was reasonable cause to believe that the Union was engaged in recognitional picketing. Quite predictably, the testimony of the witnesses for the Union and the witnesses for the employer are in direct conflict. The other evidence in the case is inconclusive on the question of the Union’s motive.

Picketing is inherently coercive and disruptive. The detrimental effect of the picketing on the employer’s operations, and on the job security of its employees, is the same no matter what a union’s true motive may be. But…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Danielson v. Joint Board Of Coat, Suit And Allied Garment Workers' UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Robert J. Wilson v. Milk Drivers And Dairy Employees Union, Local 471Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Dawidoff v. Minneapolis Building & Construction Trades Council, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API