Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1988No. 87-1695Published

1Per curiam

In resentencing the defendant,1 the trial court departed from the recommended guidelines sentence pursuant to a plea bargain in which the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere, and stipulated that factors existed allowing departure, in exchange for which the state nolle prossed another criminal charge. We affirm on the authority of Holland v. State, 508 So.2d 5 (Fla.1987); Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED.

COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.. See Bland v. State, 507 So.2d 1224 (Fla.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Key v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Bland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API