Legal Opinion
Htc Corp. v. Ipcom Gmbh & Co., Kg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 25, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1897 (RMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc., seek a declaratory judgment that their telephony products do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,390,216 (“'216 Patent”) held by IPCom GMBH & Co., KG. IPCom counterclaims that HTC products infringe the '216 Patent as well as two other Patents that IPCom owns — U.S. Patents Nos. 7,043,751 (“'751 Patent”) and 6,879,830 (“'830 Patent”). After discovery and a technology tutorial for the Court, the parties presented their respective constructions of critical patent terms in briefs and oral…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- HTC CORP. v. IPCom GmbH & Co., KGCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. Miller & Cynthia S. Miller v. Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Inc. Jennifer BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re: Dial Complete MarketingDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013