Legal Opinion
Port of Bellingham v. Bornstein Seafoods Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 4, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00245Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 PORT OF BELLINGHAM, CASE NO. C21-0245JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 12 REMAND BORNSTEIN SEAFOODS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Plaintiff Port of Bellingham’s (the “Port”) motion to remand 17 this action to Whatcom County Superior Court. (Mot. (Dkt. # 8); see also Reply (Dkt. 18 # 12).) Defendant Bornstein Seafoods, Inc. (“Bornstein”) opposes the Port’s motion. 19 (Resp. (Dkt. # 10).) The court has considered the motion, all submissions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.