Legal Opinion

Can-Am Petroleum Co. v. Beck

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1964No. 7383PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellees as plaintiffs below initiated this action under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., to recoup monies paid to the corporate defendant for undivided interests in oil and gas leases. The individual defendants are managing officers of Can-Am Petroleum Company. The trial court, concluding that the evidence supported plaintiffs’ claim that the securities were sold in violation of sections 77e and 771 of the Act,1 entered judgment for plaintiffs according to their several interests and added a joint award for costs and attorneys’ fees under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Stadia Oil & Uranium Co. v. WheelisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Athas v. DayDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1960

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Albert E. Kuehnert v. Texstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API