Legal Opinion

People v. Scardaccione

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJulius Helfand, J.

Defendant, indicted for crimes of abortion, moves, in his own words, ‘1 to determine whether there has been a violation of section 813-a of the Code of Criminal *434Procedure for the purpose of enforcing the statutory mandate of section 4506 of the Civil Practice Law and Buies which provides that evidence obtained by means of eavesdropping without a court order shall be inadmissible in criminal proceedings. ’ ’

It will be immediately noted that the defendant makes no assertion that section 813-a has in fact been violated. The hypothetical form in which his motion is couched is therefore an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Schwartz v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Benanti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Dominick Graziano v. Daniel McMann Acting Warden, Clinton Prison, and the People of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BeshanyNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. GollyNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. Granello, New York County Courts1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API