Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Fernbaugh v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1942Published

1Opinion

ON Motion for Rehearing.

BOYER, C.

— The respondent herein has filed a motion for rehearing. Motions for rehearing in this court, as applied to cases wherein the statutory right of appeal has been given, serves two purposes. By the motion we are informed of matters, of claimed error and contention of conflict with opinions of the Supreme Court. This to the end of uniformity of law. If the motion be overruled, it becomes the basis of application for certiorari in the Supreme Court. The matter of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum, herein involved, is a writ of right which the sovereign people have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weir v. MarleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Gentry v. WesthuesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Barker v. WurdemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Hiett v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API