Legal Opinion

C. M. v. A. M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 2024No. 23-0523Published

1Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT C.M., Appellant, v. A.M. and W.M., Appellees. No. 2D23-523 April 3, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche- Arkin, Judge. Mark A. Neumaier, Tampa, for Appellant. Raymond T. Elligett, Jr., of Buell & Elligett, P.A., Tampa; Jeanne T. Tate of Jeanne T. Tate, P.A., Tampa; and Michael L. Lundy of Older & Lundy, Tampa, for Appellees. KHOUZAM, Judge. Affirmed in all respects, except that the appeal as to the court's ruling on entitlement to sanctions is dismissed as premature. See Kelly v. HSBC Bank USA Nat'l…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API