Camalier & Buckley, Inc. v. Sandoz & Lamberton, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
667 A.2d 822 (1995)
CAMALIER & BUCKLEY, INC., Appellant,
v.
SANDOZ & LAMBERTON, INC., Appellee.
No. 93-CV-306.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued October 20, 1994.
Decided November 6, 1995.
Michael E. Brand, Miami Beach, FL, with whom Kenneth J. Loewinger and David K. Lietz, Washington, DC were on the brief, for appellant.
John J. Brennan, III, with whom Tonia J. Powell, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellee.
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FARRELL and KING, Associate Judges.
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to vacate a consent order…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wagner; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · King.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.