Legal Opinion

Nye v. Schuler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1959No. 464PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By COLLIER, J.:

The first question requiring the attention of the court is the appellee’s motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the files because the same was not filed in conformity with the law or the rules of this -court. As shown by the transcript of docket and journal entries, the entry overruling the motion for a new trial was filed October 1, 1958. On October 3, 1958, the notice of appeal was filed. On November 10, 1958, the bill of exceptions was delivered to the Clerk of Courts. The Clerk failed to transmit the bill of exceptions to the trial court for allowance as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tibbals v. BrandonOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dennis C. Sours v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Lake Erie Boat Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Langel v. LangelOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Kratzer v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Highland County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  5. Proctor v. FrameAkron Municipal Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API