State v. Hartwig
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
The appellant was adjudged guilty of grand larceny, larceny by check, and petit larceny, and has taken this appeal. The assignments of error which we deem necessary to consider, relate to the refusal of the court to grant appellant a continuance of his trial, (a) upon application of his attorney, based upon the ground that a case in this court in which he was counsel had been set for argument on the same date; (b) upon application made by appellant in person when the case was called for trial, and (c) upon application of an attorney appointed by the court to appear for appellant.
The case was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Hopkins v. SmathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Atlantic City RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Waxelbaum Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. HartzogWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. MaysWashington Supreme Court · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.