Legal Opinion

Moe v. Pratt, Sheriff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The first paragraph of plaintiff’s brief is as follows:

“This cause is before this court on a second notice of appeal filed after a first notice was abandoned by failure to file a transcript within the time required by law. This court has held repeatedly that the filing of a transcript within the time fixed, or some legal extension thereof is jurisdictional, and that the failure to effect an appeal in such manner exhausts the right to appeal. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss nevertheless was denied without opinion. In the hope the court will clarify the rule invoked plaintiff herewith…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ankeny v. BlakleyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. City of Eugene v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Portland v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Martin v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Amazon Cooperating Tenants v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API