Legal Opinion

Clark v. MacDonald

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals from judgments on report of referee. Affirmed. Action by Lydia A. Clark against Maria MacDonald, Carrie S. MacDonald, and others, to set aside a voluntary conveyance. From judgments for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

These are appeals by defendants from judgments on the report of a referee. The actions arise out of the transactions which were the subject of controversy in McDonald v. McDonald, (Sup.) 11 N. Y. Supp. 248; and these actions, like that, were brought by a judgment creditor to set asL.e conveyances alleged to he fraudulent. The plain tiff sought to recover *494the Main-Street property, as to which the referee reported in favor of defendant, the Spring-Street property, the annuity contract, and the bank-stock, as to all of which the referee reported in plaintiff’s favor. The conveyances were made by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arizona State Bank v. Crystal Ice & Cold Storage Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brown v. CohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Hoffman v. GrobsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API