Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrath

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1982No. C.D. 6705Published

1DissentWilliams, J.

(dissenting)—There can be no mistake that the actions of attorney Thomas F. McGrath, Jr., were wrong. Such behavior, especially by members of the bar, cannot be tolerated. Therefore, I agree that Mr. McGrath's conduct is deserving of disciplinary action by this court. I cannot agree, however, with the inflexible analysis of the majority which leads it to conclude disbarment is the only appropriate sanction. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, I dissent.

Thomas McGrath's conviction for assault in the second degree is a serious matter. It is, as the majority states, a crime involving…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SalvesenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In re the Disbarment of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API