Legal Opinion

United States of America Ex Rel. Lemuel A. Harlan v. Harold Bacon, Bonnie Bacon, John Bacon, and Kelly Bacon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-1807PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Relator Lemuel A. Harlan (“Harlan”), brought this action on behalf of the United States to recover the crops and money obtained by the Bacons under a sharecrop agreement with the Omaha Indian Tribe because the lease was not approved by the relevant governmental officials. The District Court 1 entered summary judgment for the defendants, 851 F.Supp. 367, and Harlan appeals. The issue is whether 25 U.S.C. § 81 applies to a lease of Indian lands for purposes of sharecropping. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm.

I

The parties are in agreement about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Frank B. James v. James G. WattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Montana Bank of Circle, N.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Ribo, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Lavandris JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  3. Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  5. Sicard v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API