In Re Midland United Co.

The point to be made in this concurring opinion is not one which will affect the result in this case for the majority opinion demonstrates the reason we all feci why, under the statute and general principles of law applicable, Mr. Evans must lose out even though his dealings were in the shares, of a subsidiary and not the main debtor company. But I find no reason that I can think of, why that rule should be applicable with regard to the purchases made by Mrs. Evans. Nobody would, these days, fall back on the old common law unity of husband and wife now that a married woman may keep her own…