People v. Hamilton
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBroussard, J.
I concur in the judgment affirming defendant’s conviction for first degree murder and in the special circumstance findings. I dissent from the affirmance of the death penalty.
I
The trial court’s instructions listed the 11 statutory factors of aggravation or mitigation. This statutory list of factors serves a constitutionally imposed function, that of establishing “a ‘meaningful basis for distinguishing the few cases in which [the death penalty] is imposed from the many cases in which it is not.’ ” (Godfrey v. Georgia (1980) 446 U.S. 420, 427 [64 L.Ed.2d 398, 405-406, 100 S.Ct. 1759], quoting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.