Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Hamilton

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1989No. S004485. Crim. 22911Published

1ConcurrenceBroussard, J.

I concur in the judgment affirming defendant’s conviction for first degree murder and in the special circumstance findings. I dissent from the affirmance of the death penalty.

I

The trial court’s instructions listed the 11 statutory factors of aggravation or mitigation. This statutory list of factors serves a constitutionally imposed function, that of establishing “a ‘meaningful basis for distinguishing the few cases in which [the death penalty] is imposed from the many cases in which it is not.’ ” (Godfrey v. Georgia (1980) 446 U.S. 420, 427 [64 L.Ed.2d 398, 405-406, 100 S.Ct. 1759], quoting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API